Water pricing often makes people worry about poor people. A recent study on Punjabi farmers described the environmental problems associated with farmers' wasteful use of water. Charging the farmers just 25% of the price that city people had to pay would be enough to motivate the farmers to be much more careful. This would have only a modest effect on their incomes, but would have much better environmental outcomes.
Why the farmers should pay 75% less than the poor city people is beyond me.
This whole issue of "social acceptability" for water pricing makes no sense. Water should be priced like everything else - by supply and demand. It most certainly should not be free, just as oil, plastic, and herbicides shouldn't be free. Its use has too big of an effect on everyone else.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment